Literature

Literature#

[Bar22]

Jerry T Barretto. A physical model to simulate the photoelectric effect. Physics Education, 57(5):053003, 2022. doi:10.1088/1361-6552/ac7cb2.

[CFCM04]

Catherine Crouch, Adam P Fagen, J Paul Callan, and Eric Mazur. Classroom demonstrations: learning tools or entertainment? American journal of physics, 72(6):835–838, 2004. doi:10.1119/1.1707018.

[DT98]

Peter Dekkers and Gerard Thijs. Making productive use of students' initial conceptions in developing the concept of force. Science education, 82(1):31–51, 1998.

[DC19]

Salih Demircioglu and Merve Oztas Cin. An argumentation-based demonstration experiment in teaching the light–matter interaction. Physics Education, 54(5):055010, 2019. doi:10.1088/1361-6552/ab2924.

[Ehr90]

Robert Ehrlich. Turning the world inside out and 174 other simple physics demonstrations. Princeton University Press, 1990.

[FvdBD+23]

Ineke Frederik, Ed van den Berg, Peter Dekkers, Wim Sonneveld, Wouter Spaan, Freek Pols, Kirsten Stadermann, Karel Langendonck, and Norbert van Veen. ShowdeFysica 3: natuurkunde laat je zien! NVON, 2023.

[FvdBtB+17]

Ineke Frederik, Ed van den Berg, Leo te Brinke, Peter Dekkers, Freek Pols, Wim Sonneveld, Wouter Spaan, Norbert van Veen, and Maarten van Woerkom. ShowdeFysica 2: natuurkunde laat je zien! NVON, 2017.

[FvdBtB+15]

Ineke Frederik, Ed van den Berg, Leo te Brinke, Peter Dekkers, Wim Sonneveld, Wouter Spaan, and Maarten van Woerkom. ShowdeFysica: natuurkunde laat je zien. NVON, 2015.

[HBSVdB12]

Frits Hidden, Jorn Boomsma, Anton Schins, and Ed Van den Berg. Cappuccino and specific heat versus heat of vaporization. The physics teacher, 50(2):103–104, 2012. doi:10.1119/1.3677286.

[Hod93]

Derek Hodson. Re-thinking old ways: towards a more critical approach to practical work in school science. Studies in Science Education, 1993.

[Lie87]

Tik L Liem. Invitations to science inquiry 2nd edition. ERIC, 1987.

[Lie91]

Tik L Liem. Invitations to science inquiry. ERIC, 1991.

[McC20]

William F McComas. Principal elements of nature of science: informing science teaching while dispelling the myths. Nature of science in science instruction: Rationales and strategies, pages 35–65, 2020. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_3.

[MM92]

J Mitchell and I Mitchell. Some classroom procedures. Learning from the PEEL experience, pages 210–268, 1992.

[NK13]

Stuart Naylor and Brenda Keogh. Concept cartoons: what have we learnt? Journal of Turkish Science Education, 10(1):3–11, 2013.

[PDDV22]

Freek Pols, Peter Dekkers, and Marc De Vries. Defining and assessing understandings of evidence with the assessment rubric for physics inquiry: towards integration of argumentation and inquiry. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(1):010111, 2022. doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.18.010111.

[SOSP22]

Wouter Spaan, Ron Oostdam, Jaap Schuitema, and Monique Pijls. Analysing teacher behaviour in synthesizing hands-on and minds-on during practical work. Research in Science & Technological Education, pages 1–18, 2022. doi:10.1080/02635143.2022.2098265.

[WG14]

Richard White and Richard Gunstone. Probing understanding. Routledge, 2014.

[YFF14]

Hugh D Young, Roger A Freedman, and Albert Lewis Ford. University physics with modern physics. Pearson New York, 2014.